- Posts: 4
- Thank you received: 0
If you have problems during the execution of MRCC, please attach the output with an adequate description of your case as well as the followings:
This information really helps us during troubleshooting
- the way mrcc was invoked
- the way build.mrcc was invoked
- the output of build.mrcc
- compiler version (for example: ifort -V, gfortran -v)
- blas/lapack versions
- as well as gcc and glibc versions
This information really helps us during troubleshooting
CCSDT / CCSDTQ on BS-UHF Singlet Reference
- ghjones
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
4 years 2 months ago #1006
by ghjones
CCSDT / CCSDTQ on BS-UHF Singlet Reference was created by ghjones
Hello!
I was wondering if it was possible to do single reference CCSDT or CCSDTQ calculations with the MRCC on a singlet broken-symmetry UHF reference. My initial tests seem to run into an error, yielding CC energies of NaN. When using the below input removing the occupation keyword and switching scftype=rhf, everything seems to be working fine, and the CCSDTQ O2 files from the MTEST directory using scftype=uhf seem to complete and yield the correct energies, so it seems somehow to be related to the broken symmetry singlet, not just the UHF reference.
A sample input and output are given below:
Relevant part of output attached.
Thanks,
Greg
I was wondering if it was possible to do single reference CCSDT or CCSDTQ calculations with the MRCC on a singlet broken-symmetry UHF reference. My initial tests seem to run into an error, yielding CC energies of NaN. When using the below input removing the occupation keyword and switching scftype=rhf, everything seems to be working fine, and the CCSDTQ O2 files from the MTEST directory using scftype=uhf seem to complete and yield the correct energies, so it seems somehow to be related to the broken symmetry singlet, not just the UHF reference.
A sample input and output are given below:
Code:
basis=cc-pVDZ
calc=CCSDT
mem=10000MB
mult=1
scftype=uhf
occupation=7,2/8,1
geom
<geometry here>
Relevant part of output attached.
Thanks,
Greg
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kallay
- Offline
- Administrator
- Mihaly Kallay
4 years 2 months ago #1007
by kallay
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Replied by kallay on topic CCSDT / CCSDTQ on BS-UHF Singlet Reference
Dear Greg,
There is no "occupation" keyword, the relevant keyword is occ. Probably you used this and set occ=7,2/8,1. In this case, you will get a high-spin triplet state. For a broken-symmetry UHF solution, you should lower the symmetry using keyword cmpgrp or turn it off using symm=off. Even in this case, it is not guaranteed that you get the BS symmetry solution. Then you should try to run quadratic SCF (qscf=AugHessG).
There is no "occupation" keyword, the relevant keyword is occ. Probably you used this and set occ=7,2/8,1. In this case, you will get a high-spin triplet state. For a broken-symmetry UHF solution, you should lower the symmetry using keyword cmpgrp or turn it off using symm=off. Even in this case, it is not guaranteed that you get the BS symmetry solution. Then you should try to run quadratic SCF (qscf=AugHessG).
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ghjones
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 4
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 2 months ago - 4 years 2 months ago #1008
by ghjones
Replied by ghjones on topic CCSDT / CCSDTQ on BS-UHF Singlet Reference
Dr. Kallay,
Thank you for your kind response. Yes, I did use occ= as opposed to occupation (my error in transcription).
I suppose I spoke imprecisely. I'm looking for the UHF solution corresponding to an Ms = 0 with the symmetry given (which I understand is properly a mixture of singlet, triplet, and higher spin multiplicity states), and to do CCSDTQ on this reference. Do I still need to go through quadratic SCF in a symm=off calculation to do this?
EDIT: The SCF did converge with the energy I expected from other related calculations with CFOUR, so I think the SCF has converged to my reference of interest.
Thank you for your kind response. Yes, I did use occ= as opposed to occupation (my error in transcription).
I suppose I spoke imprecisely. I'm looking for the UHF solution corresponding to an Ms = 0 with the symmetry given (which I understand is properly a mixture of singlet, triplet, and higher spin multiplicity states), and to do CCSDTQ on this reference. Do I still need to go through quadratic SCF in a symm=off calculation to do this?
EDIT: The SCF did converge with the energy I expected from other related calculations with CFOUR, so I think the SCF has converged to my reference of interest.
Last edit: 4 years 2 months ago by ghjones.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.040 seconds