- Posts: 47
- Thank you received: 0
If you have problems during the execution of MRCC, please attach the output with an adequate description of your case as well as the followings:
This information really helps us during troubleshooting
- the way mrcc was invoked
- the way build.mrcc was invoked
- the output of build.mrcc
- compiler version (for example: ifort -V, gfortran -v)
- blas/lapack versions
- as well as gcc and glibc versions
This information really helps us during troubleshooting
Fail with fort.56 with symm=1
- yanmeiyu
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
4 years 4 months ago #959
by yanmeiyu
Fail with fort.56 with symm=1 was created by yanmeiyu
Dear MRCC experts,
For a close shelled system it should be output singlet and triplet states, but the code give me states all with spin multiplicity being 2. I found fort.56 always reads nsing=0, ntrip=0 although I have defined symm=1 with nsing and ntrip of some nonzero values. I am using MRCC2015, since I still have some trouble with MRCC2019. Could you help me have a check, thank you very much!
[ymyu@admin1 Be]$ less MINP
iface=dirac
calc=CCSD
mem=7500MB
symm=1
nsing=2
ntrip=9
refdet=vector
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
and
[ymyu@admin1 Be]$ less fort.56
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 6 0 0 0.00000 0 7500 0 0.000E+00
ex.lev,nsing,ntrip, rest,CC/CI,dens,conver,symm, diag, CS ,spatial, HF ,ndoub,nacto,nactv, tol ,maxex, sacc, freq, dboc, mem, locno, eps
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I attached one test output, thank you very much for your help!
Best regards,
Yanmei
For a close shelled system it should be output singlet and triplet states, but the code give me states all with spin multiplicity being 2. I found fort.56 always reads nsing=0, ntrip=0 although I have defined symm=1 with nsing and ntrip of some nonzero values. I am using MRCC2015, since I still have some trouble with MRCC2019. Could you help me have a check, thank you very much!
[ymyu@admin1 Be]$ less MINP
iface=dirac
calc=CCSD
mem=7500MB
symm=1
nsing=2
ntrip=9
refdet=vector
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
and
[ymyu@admin1 Be]$ less fort.56
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 6 0 0 0.00000 0 7500 0 0.000E+00
ex.lev,nsing,ntrip, rest,CC/CI,dens,conver,symm, diag, CS ,spatial, HF ,ndoub,nacto,nactv, tol ,maxex, sacc, freq, dboc, mem, locno, eps
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I attached one test output, thank you very much for your help!
Best regards,
Yanmei
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kallay
- Offline
- Administrator
- Mihaly Kallay
4 years 4 months ago #960
by kallay
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Replied by kallay on topic Fail with fort.56 with symm=1
Dear Yanmei,
The file fort.56 is correct. For relativistic calculations ndoub equals the total number of states, and nsing and ntrip should be zero.
The file fort.56 is correct. For relativistic calculations ndoub equals the total number of states, and nsing and ntrip should be zero.
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- yanmeiyu
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 47
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 4 months ago #961
by yanmeiyu
Replied by yanmeiyu on topic Fail with fort.56 with symm=1
Dear Prof. Kallay,
The output giving Spin multiplicity=2 is correct or not? For singlet and triplet state, S equals to 0 and 1, so the spin multiplicity should be 1 and 3? Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Yanmei
The output giving Spin multiplicity=2 is correct or not? For singlet and triplet state, S equals to 0 and 1, so the spin multiplicity should be 1 and 3? Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Yanmei
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kallay
- Offline
- Administrator
- Mihaly Kallay
4 years 4 months ago #962
by kallay
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Replied by kallay on topic Fail with fort.56 with symm=1
That is correct. In the relativistic case, these should be ignored.
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- yanmeiyu
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 47
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 4 months ago #963
by yanmeiyu
Replied by yanmeiyu on topic Fail with fort.56 with symm=1
Prof. Kallay,
I found this output is different from my old impression using old version of mrcc so felt lost, thank you clarify my confusion.
Best regards,
Yanmei
I found this output is different from my old impression using old version of mrcc so felt lost, thank you clarify my confusion.
Best regards,
Yanmei
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.041 seconds