- Posts: 22
- Thank you received: 2
If you have problems during the execution of MRCC, please attach the output with an adequate description of your case as well as the followings:
This information really helps us during troubleshooting
- the way mrcc was invoked
- the way build.mrcc was invoked
- the output of build.mrcc
- compiler version (for example: ifort -V, gfortran -v)
- blas/lapack versions
- as well as gcc and glibc versions
This information really helps us during troubleshooting
NTOs
- mesterdavid
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
4 years 6 months ago #874
by mesterdavid
Replied by mesterdavid on topic NTOs
Sorry for the mistake, the wrong file was uploaded. We will fix it soon.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Edums
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 18
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 6 months ago #875
by Edums
Replied by Edums on topic NTOs
Dear David,
thanks so much. I am looking forward for the update.
Best wishes,
thanks so much. I am looking forward for the update.
Best wishes,
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mesterdavid
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 22
- Thank you received: 2
4 years 6 months ago #876
by mesterdavid
Replied by mesterdavid on topic NTOs
Dear Edums,
the correct cis and cis.f files have been uploaded:
mrcc.hu/index.php/download-mrcc/category/5-mrcc-patches
Thank you for your patience!
Best regards,
Dávid
the correct cis and cis.f files have been uploaded:
mrcc.hu/index.php/download-mrcc/category/5-mrcc-patches
Thank you for your patience!
Best regards,
Dávid
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Edums
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 18
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 6 months ago #877
by Edums
Replied by Edums on topic NTOs
Dear David,
thanks a lot. I have tried them and I got the NTOs now. I really appreciate your effort and timely help.
thanks a lot. I have tried them and I got the NTOs now. I really appreciate your effort and timely help.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Edums
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 18
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 3 months ago #956
by Edums
Replied by Edums on topic NTOs
Dear David,
I was using the patch successfully for a while with cal=adc(2), but when I tried cal=tddft (and added a DFT functional), the NTOs are not generated.
I understand from your post #871 that the NTOs should also be available for TD-DFT. If that is the case, is there anything else to do in addition to include molden=on and verbosity=3 to recover NTOs with TD-DFT? I am attaching an input file that generates NTOs with ADC(2), but not with TD-DFT.
I would appreciate if you can check this for me. Thanks a lot!
I was using the patch successfully for a while with cal=adc(2), but when I tried cal=tddft (and added a DFT functional), the NTOs are not generated.
I understand from your post #871 that the NTOs should also be available for TD-DFT. If that is the case, is there anything else to do in addition to include molden=on and verbosity=3 to recover NTOs with TD-DFT? I am attaching an input file that generates NTOs with ADC(2), but not with TD-DFT.
I would appreciate if you can check this for me. Thanks a lot!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mesterdavid
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 22
- Thank you received: 2
4 years 3 months ago #957
by mesterdavid
Replied by mesterdavid on topic NTOs
Dear Edums,
could you, please, attach the output file?
It is really strange because the calculation crashed for me. This is an early stage implementation for the range-separated excited state calculations. However, if you set the cialg=direct keyword in the MINP file, everything goes smooth and the NTOs are stored in the MOLDEN_DH_NTO.# files. Excited-state calculations with range-separation are only available with integral direct algorithm, this will be fixed in the MINP reader.
By the way, I checked it with other DFT functionals without range-separation, and it seemed to me everything was fine and worked as was detailed in the post mentioned. In this case the NTOs are stored in the MOLDEN_CIS_NTO.# files.
could you, please, attach the output file?
It is really strange because the calculation crashed for me. This is an early stage implementation for the range-separated excited state calculations. However, if you set the cialg=direct keyword in the MINP file, everything goes smooth and the NTOs are stored in the MOLDEN_DH_NTO.# files. Excited-state calculations with range-separation are only available with integral direct algorithm, this will be fixed in the MINP reader.
By the way, I checked it with other DFT functionals without range-separation, and it seemed to me everything was fine and worked as was detailed in the post mentioned. In this case the NTOs are stored in the MOLDEN_CIS_NTO.# files.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.045 seconds