- Posts: 4
 - Thank you received: 1
 
            If you have problems during the execution of MRCC, please attach the output with an adequate description of your case as well as the followings:
This information really helps us during troubleshooting
            
        
    
    - the way mrcc was invoked
 - the way build.mrcc was invoked
 - the output of build.mrcc
 - compiler version (for example: ifort -V, gfortran -v)
 - blas/lapack versions
 - as well as gcc and glibc versions
 
This information really helps us during troubleshooting
wrong auto DF-SCF basis for def2 bases
- hokru
 - Topic Author
 - Offline
 - New Member
 - 
            
         
        Less
        More
        
            
    
        
            
        
                7 years 3 months ago                #607
        by hokru
    
    
            
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        wrong auto DF-SCF basis for def2 bases was created by hokru            
    
        version: 2018-05-23.
It seems that for the H atom the AO basis is used if dfbasis_scf=auto and basis=def2-TZVPP or def2-TZVP. It worked in the previous version. I did not test others.
Cheers,
Holger
    It seems that for the H atom the AO basis is used if dfbasis_scf=auto and basis=def2-TZVPP or def2-TZVP. It worked in the previous version. I did not test others.
Code:
Fitting basis set for the SCF calculation:
    1  C  def2-qzvpp-ri-jk [ 14s 10p 6d 2f 1g | 10s 8p 5d 1f 1g ]
    2  H  def2-qzvpp [ 7s 3p 2d 1f | 4s 3p 2d 1f ]
       ...
Cheers,
Holger
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- nagypeter
 - Offline
 - Premium Member
 - 
            
         - MRCC developer
 
            
        
                7 years 3 months ago                #608
        by nagypeter
    
    
    
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        Replied by nagypeter on topic wrong auto DF-SCF basis for def2 bases            
    
        Dear Holger,
The AO basis is set as dfbasis_scf only for the H atom by design, starting from the 2018-05-23 version, because for H the def2-qzvpp(d)-ri-jk is much smaller than the def2-qzvpp(d) basis. This change does not effect the previous dfbasis_scf selection for other than H atoms. The numerical difference between the two choices should be negligible.
If in your case dfbasis_scf=def2-qzvpp-ri-jk is desired, set dfbasis_scf=def2-qzvpp-ri-jk in the input file. This, however, might not be sufficiently large, if you use basis=def2-QZVP(PD) for molecules rich in H atoms.
I hope that helps,
Peter
    The AO basis is set as dfbasis_scf only for the H atom by design, starting from the 2018-05-23 version, because for H the def2-qzvpp(d)-ri-jk is much smaller than the def2-qzvpp(d) basis. This change does not effect the previous dfbasis_scf selection for other than H atoms. The numerical difference between the two choices should be negligible.
If in your case dfbasis_scf=def2-qzvpp-ri-jk is desired, set dfbasis_scf=def2-qzvpp-ri-jk in the input file. This, however, might not be sufficiently large, if you use basis=def2-QZVP(PD) for molecules rich in H atoms.
I hope that helps,
Peter
        The following user(s) said Thank You: hokru     
            Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hokru
 - Topic Author
 - Offline
 - New Member
 - 
            
         
        Less
        More
        
            
    
        - Posts: 4
 - Thank you received: 1
 
            
        
                7 years 3 months ago                #609
        by hokru
    
    
            
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        Replied by hokru on topic wrong auto DF-SCF basis for def2 bases            
    
        Oh okay! Thanks for clearing that up.
I understand the reasoning behind it, was just surprised by the change.
    I understand the reasoning behind it, was just surprised by the change.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
        Time to create page: 0.039 seconds