- Posts: 9
- Thank you received: 0
Symmetry In the DIRAC interface to MRCC
- wangf
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
8 years 2 months ago #307
by wangf
Dear Kallay,
First I set C2v symm In the DIRAC. Then I want to get three states of B2 symmetry of Ne using MRCC, I set
nstate=3
symm=3
But, The program will go wrong(Invalid number of roots!).
Attachments is DIRAC and MRCC input files.
Replied by wangf on topic Symmetry In the DIRAC interface to MRCC
Dear Kallay,
First I set C2v symm In the DIRAC. Then I want to get three states of B2 symmetry of Ne using MRCC, I set
nstate=3
symm=3
But, The program will go wrong(Invalid number of roots!).
Attachments is DIRAC and MRCC input files.
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kallay
- Offline
- Administrator
- Mihaly Kallay
8 years 2 months ago #308
by kallay
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Replied by kallay on topic Symmetry In the DIRAC interface to MRCC
Dear Gaodongdong,
In your calculations you used the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian, and consequently double group symmetry. was employed, so symm can only take the values of 1 or 2.
In your calculations you used the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian, and consequently double group symmetry. was employed, so symm can only take the values of 1 or 2.
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- wangf
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 9
- Thank you received: 0
8 years 2 months ago #309
by wangf
Replied by wangf on topic Symmetry In the DIRAC interface to MRCC
Dear Kallay,
I found:
If I set C2v symm in DIRAC, I can only take the values of 1 or 2 in MRCC.
If I set D2h symm in DIRAC, I can only take the values of 1,2,3 or 4 in MRCC.
I really want to know the relationship between symm in DIRAC and symm in MRCC or the symm in Dirac are the same as in MRCC when I used the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian. Which irreducible representation do 1 and 2 represent respectively?
I found:
If I set C2v symm in DIRAC, I can only take the values of 1 or 2 in MRCC.
If I set D2h symm in DIRAC, I can only take the values of 1,2,3 or 4 in MRCC.
I really want to know the relationship between symm in DIRAC and symm in MRCC or the symm in Dirac are the same as in MRCC when I used the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian. Which irreducible representation do 1 and 2 represent respectively?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- wangf
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 9
- Thank you received: 0
8 years 1 month ago #310
by wangf
Replied by wangf on topic Symmetry In the DIRAC interface to MRCC
Dear Kallay,
I found:
If I set C2v symm in DIRAC, I can only take the values of 1 or 2 in MRCC.
If I set D2h symm in DIRAC, I can only take the values of 1,2,3 or 4 in MRCC.
I really want to know the relationship between symm in DIRAC and symm in MRCC or the symm in Dirac are the same as in MRCC when I used the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian. Which irreducible representation do 1 and 2 represent respectively?
I found:
If I set C2v symm in DIRAC, I can only take the values of 1 or 2 in MRCC.
If I set D2h symm in DIRAC, I can only take the values of 1,2,3 or 4 in MRCC.
I really want to know the relationship between symm in DIRAC and symm in MRCC or the symm in Dirac are the same as in MRCC when I used the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian. Which irreducible representation do 1 and 2 represent respectively?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kallay
- Offline
- Administrator
- Mihaly Kallay
8 years 1 month ago #311
by kallay
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Replied by kallay on topic Symmetry In the DIRAC interface to MRCC
Dear Gaodongdong,
Sorry I misled you. You should specify the largest Abelian group in the .mol file, not the largest Abelian double group, and Dirac will automatically select the largest Abelian double group. That is, for an atom you should set D2h in the .mol file.
In your calculations you had 2 and 4 irreps since the largest Abelian double groups, C2* and C2h*, were selected for the groups C2v and D2h, respectively.
Sorry I misled you. You should specify the largest Abelian group in the .mol file, not the largest Abelian double group, and Dirac will automatically select the largest Abelian double group. That is, for an atom you should set D2h in the .mol file.
In your calculations you had 2 and 4 irreps since the largest Abelian double groups, C2* and C2h*, were selected for the groups C2v and D2h, respectively.
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.041 seconds