- Posts: 7
- Thank you received: 0
The difference between molpro and mrcc
- jamcas
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
4 years 7 months ago #879
by jamcas
The difference between molpro and mrcc was created by jamcas
I found a question that puzzled me, that is, for the same closded shell system, the triples (T) contribution for mrcc and molpro is totally different:.
molpro:
E(CCSD);-2980.779852732739
CCSD(T) correction:-0.324599006747
E(CCSD(T):-2981.10445174
mrcc:
E(CCSD);-2980.779847028194
CCSD(T) correction:-0.369297289025
E(CCSD(T):-2981.149144317219
My input file:
I also tested N2 and I got the same result:
molpro:
E(CCSD);-109.278009380004
CCSD(T) correction:-0.015147862165
E(CCSD(T):-109.29315724
mrcc:
E(CCSD);-109.278009034846
CCSD(T) correction:-0.015291141772
E(CCSD(T):-109.293300176618
molpro:
E(CCSD);-2980.779852732739
CCSD(T) correction:-0.324599006747
E(CCSD(T):-2981.10445174
mrcc:
E(CCSD);-2980.779847028194
CCSD(T) correction:-0.369297289025
E(CCSD(T):-2981.149144317219
My input file:
Code:
basis=aug-cc-pvdz
calc=ccsd(t)
scftype=rhf
dft=user
2
1.0 b88
1.0 pw91c
mem=60GB
dfbasiscor=none
dfbasis_scf=none
ccmaxit=50000
scfmaxit=20000
mult=1
charge=-1
scfdamp=0.7
scflshift=5
verbosity = 3
unit=angs
geom=xyz
7
C -0.35087300 1.64374600 0.00250500
C 1.01404000 1.70160700 0.00213000
C 1.01401300 -1.70160600 -0.00211500
C -0.35091000 -1.64372500 -0.00255200
V 0.54132900 0.00190000 -1.06181900
V 0.54127000 -0.00191700 1.06185300
V -1.42858300 0.00001200 -0.00002500
I also tested N2 and I got the same result:
molpro:
E(CCSD);-109.278009380004
CCSD(T) correction:-0.015147862165
E(CCSD(T):-109.29315724
mrcc:
E(CCSD);-109.278009034846
CCSD(T) correction:-0.015291141772
E(CCSD(T):-109.293300176618
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Nike
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 97
- Thank you received: 3
4 years 7 months ago #880
by Nike
Replied by Nike on topic The difference between molpro and mrcc
Dear jamcas,
1) One difference is in the integral transformation for frozen core systems, but in your closed-shell system I would hope the difference wouldn't be this big.
2) I believe MRCC does UCCSD whereas in MOLPRO you can specify RCCSD or UCCSD, so you might want to show us your input file (it won't be very big anyway).
3) Are your SCF (Hartree-Fock) energies the same?
With best wishes,
Nike
1) One difference is in the integral transformation for frozen core systems, but in your closed-shell system I would hope the difference wouldn't be this big.
2) I believe MRCC does UCCSD whereas in MOLPRO you can specify RCCSD or UCCSD, so you might want to show us your input file (it won't be very big anyway).
3) Are your SCF (Hartree-Fock) energies the same?
With best wishes,
Nike
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jamcas
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 7
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 7 months ago #881
by jamcas
Replied by jamcas on topic The difference between molpro and mrcc
2. This is my molpro input:
3.Yes, both the reference energy and the ccsd correlation energy are same.
Reference energy
molpro:-2979.279074961804
mrcc:-2979.279083044167
Code:
memory,300,m
file,2,r-m1-34n-avdz-ccsdt.wfu,old
gprint,basis,orbitals,civector;
gthresh,printci=0.05;
geometry={angstrom;
C -0.35087300 1.64374600 0.00250500
C 1.01404000 1.70160700 0.00213000
C 1.01401300 -1.70160600 -0.00211500
C -0.35091000 -1.64372500 -0.00255200
V 0.54132900 0.00190000 -1.06181900
V 0.54127000 -0.00191700 1.06185300
V -1.42858300 0.00001200 -0.00002500
}
basis={
c=avdz
v=avdz
}
{rks,b,pw91c;
closed,47;
occ,47;
wf,94,1,0;
ACCU,14;
}
{rccsd(t);
shift,1,1;
core,31;
closed,47;
occ,47;
wf,94,1,0;
}
3.Yes, both the reference energy and the ccsd correlation energy are same.
Reference energy
molpro:-2979.279074961804
mrcc:-2979.279083044167
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kallay
- Offline
- Administrator
- Mihaly Kallay
4 years 7 months ago #882
by kallay
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Replied by kallay on topic The difference between molpro and mrcc
Probably the reason is that the contribution of the occupied-virtual block of the Fock-operator to the (T) correction is also calculated in molpro. This contribution is zero for canonical HF. It is not zero for a KS reference but it is usually small.
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jamcas
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 7
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 7 months ago #883
by jamcas
Replied by jamcas on topic The difference between molpro and mrcc
Thanks for your reply! How to get a open-shell singlet solution in mrcc? I know gaussian can performe stable check, but I don't seem to see similar keywords in mrcc.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kallay
- Offline
- Administrator
- Mihaly Kallay
4 years 7 months ago #884
by kallay
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Replied by kallay on topic The difference between molpro and mrcc
You can get an open-shell singlet state with MCSCF.
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.042 seconds