If you have problems during the execution of MRCC, please attach the output with an adequate description of your case as well as the followings:
This information really helps us during troubleshooting
- the way mrcc was invoked
- the way build.mrcc was invoked
- the output of build.mrcc
- compiler version (for example: ifort -V, gfortran -v)
- blas/lapack versions
- as well as gcc and glibc versions
This information really helps us during troubleshooting
Less vir. orb. in CCSDT calculation with Molpro
- pjerabek
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
7 years 8 months ago #346
by pjerabek
Less vir. orb. in CCSDT calculation with Molpro was created by pjerabek
Hello,
I need to calculate the CCSDT energies of a fairly large system in a completely uncontracted basis set and want to reduce my memory requirements by restricting the excitations to certain virtual orbital below a energy cutoff value of, say, 30 a.u. (which is e.g. possible in DIRAC). For my system I'm restricted to Molpro2015 and the implemented MRCC interface.
Let's say, the totally uncontracted basis set produces 500 virtual orbitals, but I want to kick out the upper 400 virtuals to speed up my calculation.
The only possibility I found for doing that is by manually modifying the vector in the fort.56 file and the orbitals and the corresponding integrals in the fort.55 file.
Is there possibly another way of doing this or a work-around?
Many thanks in advance!
I need to calculate the CCSDT energies of a fairly large system in a completely uncontracted basis set and want to reduce my memory requirements by restricting the excitations to certain virtual orbital below a energy cutoff value of, say, 30 a.u. (which is e.g. possible in DIRAC). For my system I'm restricted to Molpro2015 and the implemented MRCC interface.
Let's say, the totally uncontracted basis set produces 500 virtual orbitals, but I want to kick out the upper 400 virtuals to speed up my calculation.
The only possibility I found for doing that is by manually modifying the vector in the fort.56 file and the orbitals and the corresponding integrals in the fort.55 file.
Is there possibly another way of doing this or a work-around?
Many thanks in advance!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kallay
- Offline
- Administrator
- Mihaly Kallay
7 years 8 months ago #347
by kallay
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Replied by kallay on topic Less vir. orb. in CCSDT calculation with Molpro
Unfortunately, currently this is the only way.
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
The following user(s) said Thank You: pjerabek
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pjerabek
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
7 years 8 months ago #348
by pjerabek
Replied by pjerabek on topic Less vir. orb. in CCSDT calculation with Molpro
Thank you, I will start scripting then.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kallay
- Offline
- Administrator
- Mihaly Kallay
7 years 8 months ago #349
by kallay
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Replied by kallay on topic Less vir. orb. in CCSDT calculation with Molpro
It just came into my mind that there is a better option. You should try MP2 natural orbitals or optimized virtual orbitals (see the description of keyword ovirt in the manual as well as JCP 134, 124111, 2011). In this way your CCSDT energy will be more accurate, and you do not need to bother with the integral files.
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
The following user(s) said Thank You: pjerabek
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pjerabek
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
7 years 8 months ago #350
by pjerabek
Replied by pjerabek on topic Less vir. orb. in CCSDT calculation with Molpro
Thank you, I'll give it a shot!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pjerabek
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
7 years 8 months ago #352
by pjerabek
Replied by pjerabek on topic Less vir. orb. in CCSDT calculation with Molpro
Follow-up question:
Is the program "ovirt" called automatically when "dmrcc" gets executed and the appropriate keyword is set? I'm using the MINP file format and cannot seem any difference between the two cases.
(Please see attached files)
Thanks again and best wishes,
Paul
Is the program "ovirt" called automatically when "dmrcc" gets executed and the appropriate keyword is set? I'm using the MINP file format and cannot seem any difference between the two cases.
(Please see attached files)
Thanks again and best wishes,
Paul
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.043 seconds