If you have problems during the execution of MRCC, please attach the output with an adequate description of your case as well as the followings:
This information really helps us during troubleshooting
            
        
    
    - the way mrcc was invoked
 - the way build.mrcc was invoked
 - the output of build.mrcc
 - compiler version (for example: ifort -V, gfortran -v)
 - blas/lapack versions
 - as well as gcc and glibc versions
 
This information really helps us during troubleshooting
Less vir. orb. in CCSDT calculation with Molpro
- pjerabek
 - Topic Author
 - Offline
 - New Member
 - 
            
         
        Less
        More
        
    
        
            
        
                8 years 7 months ago                #346
        by pjerabek
    
    
            
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        Less vir. orb. in CCSDT calculation with Molpro was created by pjerabek            
    
        Hello,
I need to calculate the CCSDT energies of a fairly large system in a completely uncontracted basis set and want to reduce my memory requirements by restricting the excitations to certain virtual orbital below a energy cutoff value of, say, 30 a.u. (which is e.g. possible in DIRAC). For my system I'm restricted to Molpro2015 and the implemented MRCC interface.
Let's say, the totally uncontracted basis set produces 500 virtual orbitals, but I want to kick out the upper 400 virtuals to speed up my calculation.
The only possibility I found for doing that is by manually modifying the vector in the fort.56 file and the orbitals and the corresponding integrals in the fort.55 file.
Is there possibly another way of doing this or a work-around?
Many thanks in advance!
    I need to calculate the CCSDT energies of a fairly large system in a completely uncontracted basis set and want to reduce my memory requirements by restricting the excitations to certain virtual orbital below a energy cutoff value of, say, 30 a.u. (which is e.g. possible in DIRAC). For my system I'm restricted to Molpro2015 and the implemented MRCC interface.
Let's say, the totally uncontracted basis set produces 500 virtual orbitals, but I want to kick out the upper 400 virtuals to speed up my calculation.
The only possibility I found for doing that is by manually modifying the vector in the fort.56 file and the orbitals and the corresponding integrals in the fort.55 file.
Is there possibly another way of doing this or a work-around?
Many thanks in advance!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kallay
 - Offline
 - Administrator
 - 
            
         - Mihaly Kallay
 
            
        
                8 years 7 months ago                #347
        by kallay
    
    
            
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
    
    
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        Replied by kallay on topic Less vir. orb. in CCSDT calculation with Molpro            
    
        Unfortunately, currently this is the only way.    
            Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
        The following user(s) said Thank You: pjerabek     
            Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pjerabek
 - Topic Author
 - Offline
 - New Member
 - 
            
         
            
        
                8 years 7 months ago                #348
        by pjerabek
    
    
            
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        Replied by pjerabek on topic Less vir. orb. in CCSDT calculation with Molpro            
    
        Thank you, I will start scripting then. 
    
    Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kallay
 - Offline
 - Administrator
 - 
            
         - Mihaly Kallay
 
            
        
                8 years 7 months ago                #349
        by kallay
    
    
            
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
    
    
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        Replied by kallay on topic Less vir. orb. in CCSDT calculation with Molpro            
    
        It just came into my mind that there is a better option. You should try MP2 natural orbitals or optimized virtual orbitals (see the description of keyword ovirt in the manual as well as JCP 134, 124111, 2011). In this way your CCSDT energy will be more accurate, and you do not need to bother with the integral files.    
            Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
        The following user(s) said Thank You: pjerabek     
            Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pjerabek
 - Topic Author
 - Offline
 - New Member
 - 
            
         
            
        
                8 years 7 months ago                #350
        by pjerabek
    
    
            
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        Replied by pjerabek on topic Less vir. orb. in CCSDT calculation with Molpro            
    
        Thank you, I'll give it a shot!    
    Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pjerabek
 - Topic Author
 - Offline
 - New Member
 - 
            
         
            
        
                8 years 7 months ago                #352
        by pjerabek
    
    
 	
					
                                	
			
				    
            
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        Replied by pjerabek on topic Less vir. orb. in CCSDT calculation with Molpro            
    
        Follow-up question:
Is the program "ovirt" called automatically when "dmrcc" gets executed and the appropriate keyword is set? I'm using the MINP file format and cannot seem any difference between the two cases.
(Please see attached files)
Thanks again and best wishes,
Paul
    Is the program "ovirt" called automatically when "dmrcc" gets executed and the appropriate keyword is set? I'm using the MINP file format and cannot seem any difference between the two cases.
(Please see attached files)
Thanks again and best wishes,
Paul
Attachments:
            	      
												
            	
            	Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
        Time to create page: 0.042 seconds