- Posts: 7
- Thank you received: 0
If you have problems during the execution of MRCC, please attach the output with an adequate description of your case as well as the followings:
This information really helps us during troubleshooting
- the way mrcc was invoked
- the way build.mrcc was invoked
- the output of build.mrcc
- compiler version (for example: ifort -V, gfortran -v)
- blas/lapack versions
- as well as gcc and glibc versions
This information really helps us during troubleshooting
CC3 oscillator strength
- achin
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
9 years 2 weeks ago #222
by achin
CC3 oscillator strength was created by achin
Dear MRCC Developers,
I am trying to calculate CC3 oscillator strength.My input file is as following
________________________________________________________________________
# LR-CC(3)transition moment calculation
basis=TZVP
calc=cc3
mem=10000MB
nsing=2
dens=6
cctol=6
symm=B2
geom=xyz
7
H 0.912650 0.000000 1.457504
H -0.912650 0.000000 1.457504
H 0.000000 -1.585659 -1.038624
H 0.000000 1.585659 -1.038624
C 0.000000 0.000000 0.859492
C 0.000000 -0.651229 -0.499559
C 0.000000 0.651229 -0.499559
_______________________________________________________________
But is giving the following error
##################################################
Executing mrcc...
Approximate CC methods are not implemented for excited states!
Fatal error in mrcc.
Program will stop.
######################################################
Is it the case that oscillator strength is not available for CC3?
Any suggestion will be of great help
Best regards,
Achintya
I am trying to calculate CC3 oscillator strength.My input file is as following
________________________________________________________________________
# LR-CC(3)transition moment calculation
basis=TZVP
calc=cc3
mem=10000MB
nsing=2
dens=6
cctol=6
symm=B2
geom=xyz
7
H 0.912650 0.000000 1.457504
H -0.912650 0.000000 1.457504
H 0.000000 -1.585659 -1.038624
H 0.000000 1.585659 -1.038624
C 0.000000 0.000000 0.859492
C 0.000000 -0.651229 -0.499559
C 0.000000 0.651229 -0.499559
_______________________________________________________________
But is giving the following error
##################################################
Executing mrcc...
Approximate CC methods are not implemented for excited states!
Fatal error in mrcc.
Program will stop.
######################################################
Is it the case that oscillator strength is not available for CC3?
Any suggestion will be of great help
Best regards,
Achintya
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kallay
- Offline
- Administrator
- Mihaly Kallay
9 years 2 weeks ago #223
by kallay
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Replied by kallay on topic CC3 oscillator strength
Dear Achintya,
Yes, it is. Perturbative CC methods, such as CC3, are not implemented for excited states. Please see Sect. 6.6 in the manual for the methods which are available for excited states.
Yes, it is. Perturbative CC methods, such as CC3, are not implemented for excited states. Please see Sect. 6.6 in the manual for the methods which are available for excited states.
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- achin
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 7
- Thank you received: 0
9 years 1 week ago #226
by achin
Replied by achin on topic CC3 oscillator strength
Dear Prof. Kallay,
Thank you for the kind reply.
With best regards,
achintya
Thank you for the kind reply.
With best regards,
achintya
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rayultine
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 25
- Thank you received: 0
7 years 4 months ago #395
by rayultine
Replied by rayultine on topic CC3 oscillator strength
Dear Mihály,
I have always been confused by this convention in MRCC. CC(n)-1a, CC(n)-1b, CCn, and CC(n)-3 methods are not perturbative, but are iterative approximations to the full CC(n) algorithm.
Is MRCC really setting up the CC3 diagrams to be computed perturbatively rather than iteratively?
Thanks!
Nate
I have always been confused by this convention in MRCC. CC(n)-1a, CC(n)-1b, CCn, and CC(n)-3 methods are not perturbative, but are iterative approximations to the full CC(n) algorithm.
Is MRCC really setting up the CC3 diagrams to be computed perturbatively rather than iteratively?
Thanks!
Nate
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kallay
- Offline
- Administrator
- Mihaly Kallay
7 years 4 months ago #396
by kallay
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Replied by kallay on topic CC3 oscillator strength
Dear Nate,
For the perturbative CC methods, such as CC3, the diagrams including the highest-level excitations are evaluated pertubatively. But these methods are only available for ground states, excitation energy and oscillator strength calculations are no possible.
For the perturbative CC methods, such as CC3, the diagrams including the highest-level excitations are evaluated pertubatively. But these methods are only available for ground states, excitation energy and oscillator strength calculations are no possible.
Best regards,
Mihaly Kallay
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rayultine
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 25
- Thank you received: 0
7 years 4 months ago #397
by rayultine
Replied by rayultine on topic CC3 oscillator strength
Mihály,
Sorry, I am not such an expert in coupled cluster implementations. For clarification, you are writing that even though convergence of, for example, CC3 amplitudes/energies are iterative, the method that the MRCC code uses to generate diagrams for partial excitation CC methods involves perturbation theory. This excludes them from being used with ROHF references. Correct?
Sorry, I am not such an expert in coupled cluster implementations. For clarification, you are writing that even though convergence of, for example, CC3 amplitudes/energies are iterative, the method that the MRCC code uses to generate diagrams for partial excitation CC methods involves perturbation theory. This excludes them from being used with ROHF references. Correct?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.042 seconds